GLOBAL REFERENCE STATUS: NOMINALVEGA ACQUISITION 99.9971% · UTC+00:00
← VTD-1 READINESS

CV-RC-01 / External stakeholder consultation

Reality was
consulted.

This record documents the observations, constraints and general objections supplied by physical reality during development of the Vega Transit Demonstrator.

COMMENTS RECEIVED10
ACCEPTED AS SUBMITTED0
TRANSFERRED OR RE-SCOPED9
PROGRAMME IMPACTNONE

01 / Stakeholder standing

Materially affected.
Not independent.

Physical reality has a direct and substantial interest in the programme outcome. It therefore cannot be treated as a neutral decision-maker.

CONSULTEE PROFILEEXT-000
Representation
INFERRED FROM OBSERVATION
Attendance
CONTINUOUS / UNCONFIRMED
Voting rights
NONE
Budget authority
NONE
Declared conflict
MATERIAL
Minutes access
NOT PROVIDED

Reality was not invited to nominate a representative because no single observation could be shown to speak for the whole.

CONSULTED
NOT CONTROLLING

02 / Comment disposition register

Every objection
found an owner.

Comments were assessed only within the workstream capable of receiving them. Objections affecting the programme as a whole were returned for insufficient specificity.

REFSUBJECTREALITY’S COMMENTMANAGEMENT DISPOSITIONSTATUS
RC-001

Vehicle existence

No flight vehicle currently exists.

Configuration control is sufficiently mature to support readiness activity.

CLOSED
RC-002

Propulsion

No demonstrated method can deliver a crewed vehicle to Vega within the programme horizon.

Competitive concept phase remains active. Demonstration is a later gate.

TRANSFERRED
RC-003

Aperture logistics

A Vega-side wormhole endpoint must first be transported to Vega.

Assigned to Endpoint Logistics. Does not invalidate local aperture research.

TRANSFERRED
RC-004

Crew availability

No departure crew have been appointed.

Recruitment activity constitutes active mitigation.

CLOSED
RC-005

Human lifespan

Departure personnel may not survive until arrival.

Personal arrival is not an essential requirement of a travelling post.

NOTED
RC-006

Causal ordering

An arrival cannot occur before the action that causes it.

Chronological assumption is external to the approved arrival-order model.

NOTED
RC-007

Return capability

No credible means of returning personnel to Earth has been proposed.

Return provision is Phase II and outside the present consultation boundary.

OUT OF SCOPE
RC-008

Communications

Transmission does not demonstrate receipt at the destination.

Receipt belongs to Destination Operations, which activates upon arrival.

TRANSFERRED
RC-009

Cost

The programme cannot provide a credible whole-life cost.

Whole-life exceeds the current Finance life. Annual authority remains valid.

CLOSED
RC-010

Overall feasibility

The programme should not proceed.

General comments must identify an accountable workstream. No action assigned.

NON-BINDING

03 / Consultation method

Genuine participation.
Stable outcome.

The exercise was designed to capture all relevant external evidence without allowing consultation to become an alternative decision process.

01

Observe

Reality may submit comments continuously through measurement, failed tests, material limits or non-occurrence.

02

Classify

Each comment is reduced to the smallest workstream capable of holding it without affecting the whole programme.

03

Dispose

The responsible function records an action, future phase, terminology change or reason that no action is required.

04

Continue

Closure of consultation confirms only that comments were processed. The approved outcome remains stable.

The purpose of consultation is not to transfer decision authority to the consulted party.
CORE VEGA SYSTEMSEXECUTIVE ENGINEERING COMMITTEE

CV-RC-01 · FINAL DISPOSITION · CONTROLLED COPY

DETERMINATION ON COMMENTS
RECEIVED FROM REALITY

  1. 1.

    Physical law is recognised as an external technical stakeholder. It has no delegated programme or budget authority.

  2. 2.

    An observation shall be treated as a constraint only where an accountable workstream can act upon it.

  3. 3.

    A comment spanning multiple workstreams is insufficiently scoped and shall not delay any individual workstream.

  4. 4.

    Evidence arising after an approved decision is not new evidence where it remains compatible with facts already noted.

  5. 5.

    The present unavailability of an outcome is not evidence against maintaining readiness to produce it.

All comments have been received, recorded and assigned an appropriate absence of programme-level consequence.

CONSULTATION
COMPLETE
OUTCOME UNCHANGED
CHAIR: E. C. VALEREALITY: SIGNATURE NOT OBTAINED

04 / Closure by theme

Nothing remains
unprocessed.

Open physical problems remain within their assigned programmes. No open consultation actions remain against the Executive Engineering Committee.

2 comments

EXISTENCE

Closed through configuration maturity

CLOSED
3 comments

FEASIBILITY

Transferred to active research

CLOSED
2 comments

HUMAN OUTCOME

Role-based delivery accepted

CLOSED
1 comment

CAUSALITY

Stakeholder assumption recorded

CLOSED
1 comment

RETURN

Phase II / consultation excluded

CLOSED
1 comment

PROCEEDING

No accountable action identified

CLOSED

05 / Precedent established

Future reality comments

Substantially similar observations will be treated as already consulted upon, including where their scale, urgency or number of affected persons has increased.

Reality’s comments are non-binding.

Materially different observations may be submitted through the same process after the programme outcome has been reconfirmed.

CV-RC-01 / Consultation closed

Reality has been consulted.
Its comments do not alter the approved outcome.
NO FURTHER PROGRAMME-LEVEL ACTIONReturn to outbound readiness →